UK time is: 02:14:56
Vital Login
Social Login

Choose your club

Other Sites

Network Navigation

Vital Partners

'If It's Football, It's Vital'

Grabbing Your Attention

Sitting on the tube as it rattled through the underground network, this morning, I couldn`t help but notice some interesting speculation in that free paper everyone grabs - The Metro.

It infers that Fulham are interested in two striking targets, but at opposite ends of the spectrum as I would say.

The first inference is that the summer-long interest in the Huddersfield striker Jordan Rhodes, is set to continue with Fulham trying to lever the Scottish international away from Yorkshire and to London.

The second infers that Martin Jol is trying to lure the Russian international Andrey Arshavin to Craven Cottage. Arshavin has suffered mixed fortunes at Arsenal in recent times and was sent back to Russia on loan for a period last season.

Out of the two, which would you prefer Martin Jol to concentrate his chase on?



Vital Fulham on: facebook

Vital Fulham on: twitter

Join Vital Fulham

It's easy to REGISTER HERE, simply click the link and enjoy getting involved!




Use your social login to comment on front page articles. Login using you Facebook, Twitter, Google or LinkedIn accounts and have your say!



Click here to join in the debate on the club forum.

The Journalist

Writer: Andrew Joyce  Mail feedback, articles or suggestions

Date:Thursday August 2 2012

Time: 4:56PM

Your Comments

arshavin did not impress at arsenal, and i don't think he'd improve at fulham... rhodes for me, thank you...
woodysweats
why buy Rhodes when Trotta had a better goals to game ratio playing for a much worse club in the same league albeit for a much smaller stint. There's absolutely no point in spending big money on someone who's only played in league 1. If Arshavin takes a wage drop and we get him for next to nothing then i don't see why not. people forget the form he showed in euro 2008 and that liverpool game when he first signed for arsenal. if he could recreate that form then he'd be great.
darwinvoyager
I'll take Arshavin. He is the kind of player who can create his own chances. Given the player turnover that we're having, such a skill could be important to us while the new players get integrated into the system. Arshavin with some consistent playing time I think could flourish. He definitely has the talent - he just needs to learn consistency and stop disappearing in the middle of matches.
acrossthepond
Let him play in the hole in a 4-4-1-1 role and he will flourish.
Sajit
 

Have Your Say

Log in...
with your social network     OR     with your Vital account

Recent Fulham Articles

Stats: Fulham v Middlesbrough (Saturday April 25 2015)

Fulham v Middlesbrough - Team News (Saturday April 25 2015)

Rodallega Set to Go! (Thursday April 23 2015)

Roberts Conundrum? (Thursday April 23 2015)

We`re Definitely Staying Up (Wednesday April 22 2015)

Fulham Can Turn It Around! (Tuesday April 21 2015)

Fulham Interest in Oduwa (Tuesday April 21 2015)

Tonight We Could Be Safe (Tuesday April 21 2015)

Archived Fulham Articles

List All Vital Fulham Articles
Have your say
Click here to suggest an article
Click here to suggest a poll
ScoopDragon Publishing Entire League Network of Sites

Vital Members League (view all)

1. Gregary 11
2. Donahue6 11
3. kraziman2015 3
4. koanfayb 3
5. dobox 3
6. Oldwolf 2
7. DPICKERILL11 1

League Table (view table)

Team P W D L GD Pts
14. Sheff Wed 45 14 17 14 -6 59
15. Leeds Utd 45 15 10 20 -11 55
16. Huddersfield 45 13 15 17 -17 54
17. Fulham 45 14 10 21 -19 52
18. Bolton 44 13 12 19 -9 51
19. Reading 44 12 11 21 -23 47
20. Brighton 45 10 16 19 -10 46

Breaking League News

Match Report - Owls Suffer Loss To Leeds
Sheff Wed : 25/04/2015 23:10:00
Karanka defends decision
Middlesbrough : 25/04/2015 21:18:00
Neil: It Was The Turning Point
Norwich : 25/04/2015 21:17:01
Shattering blow for Boro
Middlesbrough : 25/04/2015 20:46:00
RUFC - Jordan Wants To Start
Rotherham : 25/04/2015 20:02:00

Current Site Poll (view all polls)

MOTM v Middlesbrough?
Suggested By:  putney
Bettinelli 0%
Hoogland 0%
Hutchinson 0%
Turner 0%
Richards 0%
Tunnicliffe 0%
Guthrie 0%
Kavanagh 0%
Ruiz 0%
Rodallega 0%
McCormack 0%
Fofana 0%
Smith 0%
Woodrow 0%