UK time is: 02:31:41
Vital Login
Social Login

Choose your club

Other Sites

Network Navigation

Vital Partners

'If It's Football, It's Vital'

Fulham Chasing City Flyer?

With the opening of the transfer window fast approaching its mid-stages, it`s been a transfer window that hasn`t exactly sparkled.

True, we`ve seen Steve Sidwell arrive but, as will normally be the case, we expect that the real bluster will come when the end of the month arrives.

But, there are still plenty of rumours floating around an done such rumour has Mark Hughes expressing an interest in the Manchester City player, Shaun Wright-Phillips.

Mark Hughes, as most of you are aware, has had previous dealings with the England winger and was the one who took him back to Manchester City after Chelsea decided he was surplus to requirements.

Interestingly, the fee mentioned appears to be quite favourable with 4 million being quoted.

Would a move for Shaun Wright-Phillips meet with your approval?

Your comments, as always, would be most welcome!


Join The Vital Debate

Vital Fulham on: facebook

Vital Fulham on: twitter










Use your social login to comment on front page articles. Login using you Facebook, Twitter, Google or LinkedIn accounts and have your say!



Click here to join in the debate on the club forum.

The Journalist

Writer: Andrew Joyce  Mail feedback, articles or suggestions

Date:Tuesday January 11 2011

Time: 4:31PM

Your Comments

I'd welcome him, he is diarrhea-fast!
artilleria pesada
SWP WHATS NOT TOO LIKE GO GET HIM MARK
truth sayer ffc
SWP WHATS NOT TOO LIKE GO GET HIM MARK
truth sayer ffc
I'm not the biggest SWP fan, but I'm all for it.
Teddy_KGB
He's not as good as he used to be, but i reckon our Shaun could do a job for you for the next couple of seasons at least. Regular games will certainly benefit him. Also heard a rumour that Hughes wants Adebayor - Shaun is a good lad, but Adebayor will poison your dressing room. Good player, but he'll think he's bigger than the club, and I'm sure you don't need the hassle for the money he'll be wanting.
fifthcolumnblue
yes for SWP! no for ADE! c'mon sparky, bring in shaun... he can fly on the wings...
woodysweats
4 mill is good, but do we really need more wingers? Dempsey, Duff, Dembele, Gera, Davies, Riise and now SWP. I see two names going in the summer if we sign him, Riise and Gera or Duff.
Riverside Chanter
dembele is more of a second striker, playing in the hole... but i agree... we have a glut of wingers... but he would be an improvement i think...
woodysweats
 

Have Your Say

Log in...
with your social network     OR     with your Vital account

Recent Fulham Articles

Striker Wanted (Wednesday May 6 2015)

Almost Half-Price Mitroglou! (Wednesday May 6 2015)

All Change at Craven Cottage (Monday May 4 2015)

Kit`s Views - Norwich (a) (Saturday May 2 2015)

Norwich 4 Fulham 2 (Saturday May 2 2015)

Stats: Norwich City v Fulham (Saturday May 2 2015)

Norwich v Fulham - Team-Sheets (Saturday May 2 2015)

Norwich v Fulham - Stat Attack (Saturday May 2 2015)

Symons - We Won the Battle! (Thursday April 30 2015)

Norwich v Fulham - Early Team News (Thursday April 30 2015)

Archived Fulham Articles

List All Vital Fulham Articles
Have your say
Click here to suggest an article
Click here to suggest a poll
ScoopDragon Publishing Entire League Network of Sites

Vital Members League (view all)

League Table (view table)

Team P W D L GD Pts
14. Forest 46 15 14 17 2 59
15. Leeds Utd 46 15 11 20 -11 56
16. Huddersfield 45 13 15 17 -17 54
17. Fulham 46 14 10 22 -21 52
18. Bolton 46 13 12 21 -13 51
19. Reading 46 13 11 22 -21 50
20. Rotherham 46 11 16 19 -21 49

Breaking League News

PWU Latics Podcast - Summer Holiday
Wigan : 06/05/2015 22:14:00
Jota In Team Of The Week
Brentford : 06/05/2015 21:20:01
End of season report card- Wingers
Reading : 06/05/2015 21:18:01
O'Hara Yet To Decide His Future
Blackpool : 06/05/2015 20:55:01
Mortensen Back In Place
Blackpool : 06/05/2015 20:43:01

Current Site Poll (view all polls)

MOTM v Norwich (a)?
Suggested By:  putney
Bettinelli 1%
Hoogland 0%
Hutchinson 11%
Burn 0%
Richards 0%
Guthrie 0%
Tunnicliffe 0%
Kavanagh 0%
Ruiz 11%
McCormack 11%
Rodallega 0%
Bodurov 0%
Smith 66%
Roberts 0%