UK time is: 12:50:23
Vital Login
Social Login

Choose your club

Other Sites

Network Navigation

Vital Partners

'If It's Football, It's Vital'

Fulham - Stimulating Thoughts!

Following the 6-2 FA Cup win over Peterborough United, Mark Hughes came up with some interesting comments.

The comments are very thought provoking and it`s very hard to argue against the point Mark is making.

Basically, Mark offer his views on why the club couldn`t go on as it was under Roy Hodgson and why changes, whether we like it or not, have to be made.

See what you think,

"It`s important you stimulate the group. You can`t rest on your laurels."

"They`ve had a couple of great years with the same group of players and not that many changes."

"They want to get to the next level, and that`s why I came here."


Is Mark right in recognizing the fact that the last two seasons were the pinnacle as far as the current group of player`s are concerned?

And, just how much change is needed to take us to that promised next level?


Join The Vital Debate

Vital Fulham on: facebook

Vital Fulham on: twitter










Use your social login to comment on front page articles. Login using you Facebook, Twitter, Google or LinkedIn accounts and have your say!



Click here to join in the debate on the club forum.

The Journalist

Writer: Andrew Joyce  Mail feedback, articles or suggestions

Date:Monday January 10 2011

Time: 4:38PM

Your Comments

THE TEAM IS OK ITS THE SQUAD THAT NEEDS TO BE STRONGER IF SAY SOMEONE GETS INJURED OR LOSS OF FORM THE PLAYER THAT STEPS IN HAS TO BE OF THE SAME STANDARD OUR FIRST 11 AT THERE BEST CAN GIVE ANY TEAM A RUN FOR THERE MONEY EVEN MAN U JUVENTIS AND MADRID AND I THINK WITH A FIT BOBBY ZAMORA WE WOULD HAVE BEATEN THEM BUT MARK IS RIGHT IN A WAY IT IS GOOG TO GIVE THEM A KICK NOW AND AGAIN JUST ASK SIR ALEX HE KEEPS THE SAME PLAYERS AND BRINGS IN ONE OR TWO EVERY YEAR COYW
truth sayer ffc
in theory it's right, but we should be higher on the table with our current squad... it's a bit bold to say you've been brought in to surpass your predecessor when you haven't come close to matching him yet...
woodysweats
Hodgson primary objective while at Fulham was to keep us out of relegation scraps. Everything else was gravy. The 'next level' costs money and I've not seen Mo willing to finance anything other than keeping our top flight status.
Teddy_KGB
 

Have Your Say

Log in...
with your social network     OR     with your Vital account

Recent Fulham Articles

What Do You Make of It? (Tuesday September 2 2014)

Wonderful Copenhagen (Monday September 1 2014)

Riise Gets Cypriot Deal (Monday September 1 2014)

It Was But a Fleeting Stay! (Sunday August 31 2014)

The Only One? (Sunday August 31 2014)

Stats: Fulham v Cardiff (Sunday August 31 2014)

Fulham v Cardiff Team-Sheets (Saturday August 30 2014)

Striker Coming? (Saturday August 30 2014)

How Dare Magath Round On Al Fayed? (Friday August 29 2014)

Fulham Draw Doncaster in 3rd Round (Thursday August 28 2014)

Archived Fulham Articles

List All Vital Fulham Articles
Have your say
Click here to suggest an article
Click here to suggest a poll

Vital Members League (view all)

1. Oldwolf 1

League Results (view all)

Latest Results
Ipswich 2 - 1 Fulham
Derby County 5 - 1 Fulham
Fulham 0 - 1 Wolves
Fulham 0 - 1 Millwall
Fulham 1 - 1 Cardiff

League Table (view table)

Team P W D L GD Pts
18. Leeds Utd 5 2 0 3 -5 6
19. Ipswich 5 1 2 2 -1 5
20. Birmingham 5 1 2 2 -5 5
21. Huddersfield 5 1 1 3 -7 4
22. Bolton 5 0 1 4 -6 1
23. Fulham 5 0 1 4 -7 1
24. Blackpool 5 0 0 5 -6 0

Breaking League News

Deadline day round up: One in, one out
Reading : 02/09/2014 10:00:00
RUFC - Skarz 'Saturday Was A Frustrating Day'
Rotherham : 02/09/2014 09:38:00
Official: Rovers Seal Steele & Tunnicliffe Moves
Blackburn : 02/09/2014 09:26:00
Transfer window closes with no new arrivals
Wolves : 02/09/2014 09:00:00
Birmingham Reject Bid For Gray
Birmingham : 02/09/2014 09:00:00

Current Site Poll (view all polls)

MOTM v Cardiff (h)?
Suggested By:  putney
Bettinelli 0%
Burn 20%
Voser 10%
Bodurov 0%
Stafylidis 0%
Parker 0%
Hyndman 20%
David 10%
Hoogland 40%
McCormack 0%
Woodrow 0%
Chihi 0%
Debele 0%
Eisfeld 0%