UK time is: 10:40:14
Vital Login
Social Login

Choose your club

Other Sites

Network Navigation

Vital Partners

'If It's Football, It's Vital'

Fulham - How About If?

If Paul Konchesky truly does have a desire to be re-united with Roy Hodgson now our old manager is running the Liverpool show, they could be about to be dashed.

Amongst the many transfer rumours in circulation about the Anfield club is one that offers the inference that Roy Hodgson may be about to launch a double raid on north-west neighbours Manchester City.

The players he`s reportedly interested in are the striker, Roque Santa Cruz, and the left back Wayne Bridge.

Therefore, by the powers of deduction it doesn`t take a genius to work out that if Bridge is one of Hodgson`s targets then he will be fulfilling the sentiments of his parting speech whereby he implicitly stated he`d not be raiding Craven Cottage to bolster the Liverpool squad.

On the other hand though, and this is purely speculative, is there anybody out there that wouldn`t mind Konchesky going to Anfield if we could lure Bridge to Craven Cottage, bearing in mind how well he was received here when he was on loan from Chelsea?

Join The Vital Debate

Vital Fulham on: facebook

Vital Fulham on: twitter





Use your social login to comment on front page articles. Login using you Facebook, Twitter, Google or LinkedIn accounts and have your say!



Click here to join in the debate on the club forum.

The Journalist

Writer: Andrew Joyce  Mail feedback, articles or suggestions

Date:Thursday August 19 2010

Time: 5:00PM

Your Comments

Where Bridge might be a possibility, I can't see why Roy would want the always-injured Santa Cruz. Regarding Bridge to Fulham scenario, the difference in performance would hardly be worth the trouble. Might as well keep Konchesky.
Teddy_KGB
I'd be pleased to keep Konch. The more stable our backline, the better.
KBFulham
If Konch does truly want to leave, and he only has a year left on his contract then I'd be happy to see Bridge pull on the white of Fulham again as a replacemnt and get some money for Konch while we still can.
Oldwolf
I like konch but he may be becoming injury prone
truth sayer ffc
old wolf has a point... in terms of contracts, it might make sense to bring bridge in... don't know what wages he would want, but konch is nearing the end of his contract...
woodysweats
 

Have Your Say

Log in...
with your social network     OR     with your Vital account

Recent Fulham Articles

Stats: Fulham v Middlesbrough (Saturday April 25 2015)

Fulham v Middlesbrough - Team News (Saturday April 25 2015)

Rodallega Set to Go! (Thursday April 23 2015)

Roberts Conundrum? (Thursday April 23 2015)

We`re Definitely Staying Up (Wednesday April 22 2015)

Fulham Can Turn It Around! (Tuesday April 21 2015)

Fulham Interest in Oduwa (Tuesday April 21 2015)

Tonight We Could Be Safe (Tuesday April 21 2015)

Archived Fulham Articles

List All Vital Fulham Articles
Have your say
Click here to suggest an article
Click here to suggest a poll
ScoopDragon Publishing Entire League Network of Sites

Vital Members League (view all)

1. Gregary 11
2. Donahue6 11
3. kraziman2015 3
4. koanfayb 3
5. dobox 3
6. Oldwolf 2
7. DPICKERILL11 1

League Table (view table)

Team P W D L GD Pts
14. Sheff Wed 45 14 17 14 -6 59
15. Leeds Utd 45 15 10 20 -11 55
16. Huddersfield 45 13 15 17 -17 54
17. Fulham 45 14 10 21 -19 52
18. Bolton 44 13 12 19 -9 51
19. Reading 44 12 11 21 -23 47
20. Brighton 45 10 16 19 -10 46

Breaking League News

Redfearn - I want to be at Leeds and be successful
Leeds Utd : 26/04/2015 10:16:01
Gray Speaks On Disappointment Of Leeds Loss
Sheff Wed : 26/04/2015 10:07:00
RUFC - View From The Opposition - Norwich City
Rotherham : 26/04/2015 10:04:01
Reading : 26/04/2015 10:00:01
LUFC Redfearn - We deserved to win
Leeds Utd : 26/04/2015 10:00:01

Current Site Poll (view all polls)

MOTM v Middlesbrough?
Suggested By:  putney
Bettinelli 0%
Hoogland 0%
Hutchinson 0%
Turner 0%
Richards 0%
Tunnicliffe 0%
Guthrie 0%
Kavanagh 0%
Ruiz 0%
Rodallega 0%
McCormack 0%
Fofana 0%
Smith 0%
Woodrow 0%