Vital Football

Latest Fulham FC News

Fulham - Greening to Sign!

Fulham - Greening to Sign!

Our most recent poll, sparked by the fact that Fulham have to decide on his future now that his loan spell is up, didn`t point too favourably in his direction.

In fact a higher percentage wouldn`t want to see him signed (70%) than do (30%), so we`d certainly be interested to hear your views on a little snippet dug from a tabloid today that implies we`re about to pay £3 million to secure his services on a permanent basis!

We await your views!

Vital Fulham on: facebook

Vital Fulham on: twitter

Join Vital Fulham

It's easy to REGISTER HERE, simply click the link and enjoy getting involved!



Click here to join in the debate on the club forum.

Writer:Andrew Joyce
Date:Tuesday June 1 2010
Time: 5:00PM

Comments

0
he is definitely not a permanent signing! we have one ageing centre midfielder in Murphy and im not being funny but Murphy is older yet 10 times the player greening is! we are fortunate in that we have a good squad and i think that with the money made this year(apparently 25m available??) i think we should be looking to 1. get a 20-25yr old CM to gradually replace Murph e.g. O'hara and 2. find a real striking threat to partner bob. this would clearly be 3mill wasted if we signed him!
Rorz_LDN
01/06/2010 17:30:00
0
If the tabloid speaks the truth, which I hope it doesn't, I can not see what Roy can see in him. He is a terrible holding midfielder. 3 million! not worth 1 million in my eyes. In Roy we trust, don't sign him!
Riverside Chanter
01/06/2010 17:33:00
0
Unfortunately, from what I've read, we owe the £3m, regardless. I'm afraid this was just a short-sighted attempt to provide depth for our European campaign. What we've done is, in order to get him on loan for one season, we agreed to pay £3m for a player who would've been out of contract this summer, anyway. Now, we're not sure if we want him. Well, we've already paid for him, so I don't that we have much choice. Really, really poor decision by the club.
Teddy_KGB
01/06/2010 17:45:00
0
My reading is that we are well and truly lumbered with a £3m guy who doesn't want to take responsibility and who only does short passes sideways and backwards.
El Tel2
01/06/2010 18:10:00
0
I was under the impression that this deal was a foregone conclusion. Still; I can voice my disgust and tell the World I'd rather he wasn't at Fulham. Not delighted. Not at that price.
KBFulham
01/06/2010 19:20:00
0
does nobody value his talent then? Perhaps he needs a good run of games!
Al Billy
01/06/2010 19:23:00
0
It took Gera two season to hit form, so I'm willing to be patient, but knowing full well that we need to find a replacement for Murphy, these kinds of deals just puzzle me! I also don't understand the fascination with signing defensive midfielders. How many do we need?
Teddy_KGB
01/06/2010 20:09:00
0
That is true Teddy. How many do we need. We did not need greening at the time and we sure do not need him now. If he hits form in two years he'll be 33. Please no but, I think it's done and dusted.
woodysweats
06/06/2010 16:12:00
Page 1/1
  1. 1

Login to post a comment

Recent Fulham Articles

FA Cup Set For 4th Sub Trial

The Football Association have confirmed that if IFAB approval is given, the FA Cup in 2016/17...

Norwich Bid £12 million for McCormack!

It would appear that the ante has been upped as far as the possible, or probable, sale of Ross McCormack goes.

Scudamore Explains Premier League 2 Thinking

Premier League chief executive Richard Scudamore has been speaking about the introduction of Premier League 2 for the 2016/17 season.

Fulham Linked with Chelsea Youngster Bamford

With the list of clubs looking to sign, if the reports are correct, Ross McCormack growing by the day, an interesting piece of transfer speculation has come our way today.

Archived Vital Fulham Articles

Vital Fulham articles from

Site Journalists

Andrew Joyce
Editor email
Profile

Current Poll (see more polls)

Will Fulham Lose Dembele and McCormack this Summer?
Suggested By: putney
Yes!68%
No!2%
Just One of the Two!30%
ScoopDragon Publishing Entire League Network of Sites

League Table

# Team P W D L Pts. GD
1 Aston Villa 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 Barnsley 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 Birmingham 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 Blackburn 0 0 0 0 0 0
5 Brentford 0 0 0 0 0 0
6 Brighton 0 0 0 0 0 0
7 Bristol City 0 0 0 0 0 0
8 Burton 0 0 0 0 0 0
9 Cardiff 0 0 0 0 0 0
10 Derby County 0 0 0 0 0 0
11 Fulham 0 0 0 0 0 0
12 Huddersfield 0 0 0 0 0 0
13 Ipswich 0 0 0 0 0 0
14 Leeds Utd 0 0 0 0 0 0
15 Newcastle 0 0 0 0 0 0
16 Norwich 0 0 0 0 0 0
17 Forest 0 0 0 0 0 0
18 Preston 0 0 0 0 0 0
19 Q.P.R. 0 0 0 0 0 0
20 Reading 0 0 0 0 0 0
21 Rotherham 0 0 0 0 0 0
22 Sheff Wed 0 0 0 0 0 0
23 Wigan 0 0 0 0 0 0
24 Wolves 0 0 0 0 0 0
Latest F1 News
Latest Vital Boxing News

Recent Fulham Results (view all)

Vital Members League Table

RankNamePoints
1.bbei6374