Vital Football

Latest Fulham FC News

FSF On Net Loss Of Football's Bumper TV Deal

FSF On Net Loss Of Football's Bumper TV Deal

Net loss on football`s bumper TV deal

One of the year`s biggest stories crept by last month without anyone paying too much attention. You`d almost think the mainstream media had a vested interest in ignoring it…

After years of burying its head in the sand the Premier League has eventually come out blinking into the sun and admitted that internet streaming could crush the professional game`s finances.

For the uninitiated, internet streaming basically means you can watch football on the net for zip all instead of splashing out on those expensive Sky and Setanta subscriptions. There are amazing parallels with the music industry which has been trying to tackle this problem since the days of Napster in the late 90s.

Both music and football have punters who show a type of love and loyalty that most industries can only dream of. Do they work with this and cherish the relationship? Do they hell. They see themselves as having a divine right to cream off every last penny they can from the 'consumer` and end up corroding much of the goodwill that got them where they are.

The music industry tried to scare fans by saying the major labels would go bust and no 'talent` would be found. People knew it was rubbish, the labels are only the delivery systems, the middleman. The net changed all that. Loads of new bands are turning their back on the majors, they can market themselves online, signing to a label is no longer the Holy Grail.

Similarly the football industry warns that if TV deals collapse we won`t be able to afford the 'talent`. Well, most people are well and truly sick of the ridiculous wages they`re asked to fund anyway and understand the contempt with which Setanta and Sky treat the average match-going fan. No sympathy here. Plus, we`re not daft, if TV deals everywhere drop through the floor, it evens out. If English teams can`t afford to pay £100,000-per-week because of free online football, how would the Italians or Spanish?

Technology brought football its billions through TV, and it`ll take them away through the internet. Take a look at the music industry. CD`s made the song digital and record labels millions as people replaced their old vinyl with CD`s. But they`ve found one almighty problem with this. You could copy analogue (remember mixtapes?!) but sound quality suffered and it was a bit of a faff. Then digital transformed all those lovely sounds into 1 and 0`s (we know 10 binary jokes and they`re both rubbish) which could be shared with minimum fuss to millions of people, for free, once the internet arrived. Whoops.

Football`s experience of this is taking longer but the same is happening. Those lovely satellite companies have gone to the trouble of digitising (and globalising) all their content so that instead of a NASA-approved-two-ton satellite dish in your backyard, all you need is a TV and credit card. Get a laptop and you can share the pictures with millions if that`s your thing.

The Premier League will huff and puff because they stand to lose billions in TV deals. But the internet is a system developed to allow the US Government to communicate in the event of a nuclear holocaust. It`s pretty Richard Scudamore proof.

Clubs are getting worried but it`s a problem of their own making. Extortionate prices mean the next generation has (largely) turned their back on the live game. A lot of younger fans today don`t need the live fix. They think football`s watched on TV anyway and the average Premier League crowd is now in its mid-40`s and rising in age year-on-year.

But what happens when the masses realise they can watch - for nothing - live games on the internet? TV revenue disappears and clubs go bust. This isn`t just a problem for the top-flight either, it goes all the way down to conference level where clubs rely massively on Setanta`s money.

Clubs have to drop prices and win back the next generation who aren`t currently hooked on the live game. Relying on the Russian Roulette of TV revenue will cost them in the end.

The Football Supporters` Federation is the organisation that campaigns for you and represents more than 142,000 fans across England and Wales. For more information, or to join, visit www.fsf.org.uk or email info@fsf.org.uk.

Writer:Site Staff
Date:Tuesday March 31 2009
Time: 1:38PM

Comments

0
If the games were on terrestrial/freeview, no-one would go online, and the clubs would get the money still!! The best way for all I think. I know it is unlikely but....it would be perfect for all involved!
KBFulham
31/03/2009 15:47:00
0
If the games were on terrestrial/freeview, no-one would go online, and the clubs would get the money still!! The best way for all I think. I know it is unlikely but....it would be perfect for all involved!
KBFulham
31/03/2009 15:47:00
0
i agree but due to the amount of money television companies need to invest in order to show the matches, terrestrial tv firms will need to up their revenue in order to pay for the rights... does this mean more adverts and / or higher tv license charges? Plus ITV have possibly the worst coverage of matches - like when they went to an ad break as Everton scored a couple months back - shameful
FFC Daz
31/03/2009 20:09:00
0
i agree but due to the amount of money television companies need to invest in order to show the matches, terrestrial tv firms will need to up their revenue in order to pay for the rights... does this mean more adverts and / or higher tv license charges? Plus ITV have possibly the worst coverage of matches - like when they went to an ad break as Everton scored a couple months back - shameful
FFC Daz
31/03/2009 20:09:00
0
FFC Daz - now that was funny! Well it made me laugh!
Al Billy
31/03/2009 20:11:00
0
FFC Daz - now that was funny! Well it made me laugh!
Al Billy
31/03/2009 20:11:00
0
It is true, but I can't think of any reasonable suggestions to keep all parties happy....
KBFulham
01/04/2009 15:28:00
0
It is true, but I can't think of any reasonable suggestions to keep all parties happy....
KBFulham
01/04/2009 15:28:00
Page 1/1
  1. 1

Login to post a comment

Recent Fulham Articles

FA Cup Set For 4th Sub Trial

The Football Association have confirmed that if IFAB approval is given, the FA Cup in 2016/17...

Norwich Bid £12 million for McCormack!

It would appear that the ante has been upped as far as the possible, or probable, sale of Ross McCormack goes.

Scudamore Explains Premier League 2 Thinking

Premier League chief executive Richard Scudamore has been speaking about the introduction of Premier League 2 for the 2016/17 season.

Fulham Linked with Chelsea Youngster Bamford

With the list of clubs looking to sign, if the reports are correct, Ross McCormack growing by the day, an interesting piece of transfer speculation has come our way today.

Archived Vital Fulham Articles

Vital Fulham articles from

Site Journalists

Andrew Joyce
Editor email
Profile

Current Poll (see more polls)

Will Fulham Lose Dembele and McCormack this Summer?
Suggested By: putney
Yes!68%
No!2%
Just One of the Two!30%
ScoopDragon Publishing Entire League Network of Sites

League Table

# Team P W D L Pts. GD
1 Aston Villa 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 Barnsley 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 Birmingham 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 Blackburn 0 0 0 0 0 0
5 Brentford 0 0 0 0 0 0
6 Brighton 0 0 0 0 0 0
7 Bristol City 0 0 0 0 0 0
8 Burton 0 0 0 0 0 0
9 Cardiff 0 0 0 0 0 0
10 Derby County 0 0 0 0 0 0
11 Fulham 0 0 0 0 0 0
12 Huddersfield 0 0 0 0 0 0
13 Ipswich 0 0 0 0 0 0
14 Leeds Utd 0 0 0 0 0 0
15 Newcastle 0 0 0 0 0 0
16 Norwich 0 0 0 0 0 0
17 Forest 0 0 0 0 0 0
18 Preston 0 0 0 0 0 0
19 Q.P.R. 0 0 0 0 0 0
20 Reading 0 0 0 0 0 0
21 Rotherham 0 0 0 0 0 0
22 Sheff Wed 0 0 0 0 0 0
23 Wigan 0 0 0 0 0 0
24 Wolves 0 0 0 0 0 0
Latest F1 News
Latest Vital Boxing News

Recent Fulham Results (view all)

Vital Members League Table

RankNamePoints
1.bbei6374