UK time is: 10:08:11
Vital Login
Social Login

Choose your club

Other Sites

Network Navigation

Vital Partners

'If It's Football, It's Vital'

Liverpool Join Hunt for Hangeland?

The Brede Hangeland affair took another turn this weekend!

With previous articles having suggested that it was undecided whether the giant Norwegian would stay at Craven cottage or leave, Roy Hodgson stepped forward and re-iterated his desire for the defender to stay but also explained if a food enough deal was proposed, a deal that suited both parties, he`d not stand in Brede`s way.

Well, according to the Sunday People a certain Rafa Benitez is now sniffing around with a view to making a possible transfer swoop. The paper then goes on to suggest that Fulham will not listen to any offers less than 10 million.

So, the questions is, if someone offers that much money is a profit of some 7.5 million, in just over a year, the sort of figure that`d persuade the board to sell?

An intriguing thought I think you`ll agree.




Use your social login to comment on front page articles. Login using you Facebook, Twitter, Google or LinkedIn accounts and have your say!



Click here to join in the debate on the club forum.

The Journalist

Writer: Andrew Joyce  Mail feedback, articles or suggestions

Date:Sunday December 7 2008

Time: 3:42PM

Your Comments

Hands off you scouse gits!
Al Billy
I don`t see the point, he would still have to be replaced, what kind of a club are we if we are going to always have to sell our best players. I know Brede may like to go to a bigger club some time down the line, but is it not too much of a pipe dream to see a player stay at a club for a spell and repay the faith his manager has shown him. It makes me sad that i can welcome Brede to Fulham after last season at the Reebock, get a "thank you" from him and then see him disappear in a flash as soon as a bigger club than us comes along.
martintheveg
has he been linked with us at City yet....????......cant remember the list is that long.....!!!
lincolnblue
7.5 million profit is good but selling him would be a massive mistake, Roy has built the defence around him and he is vital for our good defensive record to continue
Oldwolf
There's a reason we're top half of the table and it is not because of Johnson and Zamora lighting up the scoreboard. We have to keep Brede!
acrossthepond
 

Have Your Say

Log in...
with your social network     OR     with your Vital account

Recent Fulham Articles

Stats: Brentford v Fulham (Wednesday August 27 2014)

Magath on Victory at Brentford (Wednesday August 27 2014)

Why the Ruiz Deal Was Called Off! (Wednesday August 27 2014)

Brentford 0 Fulham 1 (Wednesday August 27 2014)

New Arrival, New Arrival Alert (Tuesday August 26 2014)

Brentford v Fulham - Team Sheets (Tuesday August 26 2014)

Destination San Siro? (Tuesday August 26 2014)

Owner Says Magath is the Ideal Man! (Tuesday August 26 2014)

Time to Turn to Ruiz (Tuesday August 26 2014)

Crunch Time - What Would You Do? (Monday August 25 2014)

Archived Fulham Articles

List All Vital Fulham Articles
Have your say
Click here to suggest an article
Click here to suggest a poll

Vital Members League (view all)

League Results (view all)

Latest Results
Ipswich 2 - 1 Fulham
Derby County 5 - 1 Fulham
Fulham 0 - 1 Wolves
Fulham 0 - 1 Millwall

League Table (view table)

Team P W D L GD Pts
18. Wigan 4 1 1 2 -1 4
19. Reading 4 1 1 2 -4 4
20. Huddersfield 4 1 1 2 -5 4
21. Leeds Utd 4 1 0 3 -6 3
22. Bolton 4 0 1 3 -5 1
23. Blackpool 4 0 0 4 -5 0
24. Fulham 4 0 0 4 -7 0

Breaking League News

Royals to face Rams in next round
Reading : 28/08/2014 10:00:00
RUFC - Head-to-Head v Brentford
Rotherham : 28/08/2014 09:51:00
RUFC - Ref Watch v Brentford
Rotherham : 28/08/2014 09:48:00
RUFC - Wood Disappointed With Tuesday Result
Rotherham : 28/08/2014 09:45:00
Wolves a surprise package of the Championship?
Wolves : 28/08/2014 09:00:00

Current Site Poll (view all polls)

MOTM v Brentford?
Suggested By:  putney
Bettinelli 0%
Burn 0%
Stafylidis 0%
Hutchinson 0%
Voser 0%
Parker 0%
Hoogland 0%
McCormack 50%
Williams 0%
David 50%
Woodrow 0%
Eisfeld 0%
Fotheringham 0%
Bodurov 0%