UK time is: 02:05:39
Vital Login
Social Login

Choose your club

Other Sites

Network Navigation

Vital Partners

'If It's Football, It's Vital'

McBride - Fulham to Toronto to Chicago!

I`m confused!

I`ve just picked up a paper and read that our former striker Brian McBride will be signing for Toronto FC!

But, that will not be his true destination as he`ll then be sold on immediately to Chicago Fire!

Apparently, it`s something to do with MLS rules!

Can anyone enlighten me what those rules are because it seems a bit strange to me?




Use your social login to comment on front page articles. Login using you Facebook, Twitter, Google or LinkedIn accounts and have your say!



Click here to join in the debate on the club forum.

The Journalist

Writer: Andrew Joyce  Mail feedback, articles or suggestions

Date:Thursday June 19 2008

Time: 5:03PM

Your Comments

Duhh, Me aM? confoozed two
Backslash2010
ang on he cant sign 4 chicargo fires as that is 3 clubs in a season
stfc ballboy
Keep in mind MLS is a single entity and the teams are simply franchises. When MLS was established, they set up a bunch of rules to prevent the league from collapsing like the NASL, and this allocation rule is one of them. The fear is that teams in major markets (NY, LA, and Chicago) would provide a much larger attraction for star players (like the New York Cosmos in the NASL) and the other teams would not be able to keep up. This may work in other places in the world with established fan bases, but the fear was that teams in small markets would never be able to establish fan bases if all of the high profile players declined to play for them. So this allocation rule establishes an allocation priority list. A team improves their spot on the list if they are an expansion team, if they missed the playoffs in the previous season, or by selling a player. Now I'm not sure what determines which players this rule applies to, but it seems that only star player signings fall under this rule (a separate MLS discovery claim rule applies to young players). When a player covered by this rule shows interest in signing with MLS, the team at the top of the list gets the first opportunity to sign the player. If the player wants to sign with a different team, the team at the top of the list has three options: 1. They can trade their allocation spot to the team that wants to sign the player. 2. They can pass on the player, in which case they retain their spot at the top of the allocation list. 3. They can refuse to trade their allocation, and the player cannot sign with any other MLS team (I'm not sure when this expires) Right now Toronto sits atop the list, but McBride has made it very public that he is only interested in signing with his hometown team, the Chicago Fire. For Chicago to sign him, they must reach an agreement with Toronto to acquire their allocation slot, and then come to terms with McBride. It is thought that the sticking point at the moment is that Toronto is asking for too much for the allocation spot (the rumors are that they are asking for two of Chicago's best young players). Toronto believes they have leverage because Chicago desperately wants McBride, but Chicago believes they have leverage because McBride will never sign with Toronto.
samizdat7
ohh, I Iz confoozed no more
Backslash2010
Also, to complicate things a bit, there are rumors that the US National team has asked McBride to play on the olympic team. If he does that he wouldn't be available until very late in the MLS season, which gives Chicago less incentive to sign him this season. But most people think he will only play on the olympic team if he doesn't sign w/ Chicago.
samizdat7
Now the mls rumors site is reporting that the deal is done.
samizdat7
Thanks for that Samizdat7! Very well explained!
oranje_emu
ora as Toronot published in th eforum - Toronto FC hold the #1 allocation spot for returning USMNT players...they have the first shot at signing McBride and then trading him, trading his rights without signing him, or passing all together and keeping their #1 spot. It's just a strange MLS rule that I think was put in place in the Leagues infancy to ensure all teams had and equal chance at signing good players...this rule doesn't really need to be around now since the quality of players coming to MLS has rising dramatically in the past few years...I have a strong feeling that TFC will want something for McBride though, he is still a very good player who they shouldn't pass up on.
Fulham Badger
anyone any the wiser yet?
Fulham Badger
lol - not in the slightest!
Al Billy
 

Have Your Say

Log in...
with your social network     OR     with your Vital account

Recent Articles

Wonder-Kid Tracked (Wednesday April 16 2014)

Time`s Up for Duff! (Wednesday April 16 2014)

It`s Good to Talk (Wednesday April 16 2014)

It`s a Tough Life (Tuesday April 15 2014)

What it means to Kieran! (Monday April 14 2014)

Zero to Hero! (Monday April 14 2014)

Doing Better (Monday April 14 2014)

Four of the Best! (Monday April 14 2014)

Magath Eyes Bundesliga Raid (Monday April 14 2014)

Eleven Heroes…………. (Sunday April 13 2014)

Archived Articles

List All Vital Fulham Articles
Have your say
Click here to suggest an article
Click here to suggest a poll

Vital Members League (view all)

League Results (view all)

Latest Results
Fulham 1 - 0 Norwich
Aston Villa 1 - 2 Fulham
Fulham 1 - 3 Everton
Man City 5 - 0 Fulham
Fulham 1 - 0 Newcastle
Cardiff 3 - 1 Fulham

League Table (view table)

Team P W D L GD Pts
14. Aston Villa 33 9 7 17 -14 34
15. Swansea 34 8 9 17 -5 33
16. WBA 33 6 15 12 -11 33
17. Norwich 34 8 8 18 -27 32
18. Fulham 34 9 3 22 -40 30
19. Cardiff 34 7 8 19 -34 29
20. Sunderland 33 6 8 19 -25 26

Breaking League News

The NUFC Gospel According To Tyler
» Newcastle : 16/04/2014 23:36:00
Sunderland Halt Citeh's Charge
» Sunderland : 16/04/2014 23:24:00
» Crystal Palace : 16/04/2014 22:18:00
» Sunderland : 16/04/2014 22:17:00
Liverpool: Manchester City Drop Points!
» Liverpool : 16/04/2014 22:14:00
Velikonja Excited By Cardiff Future
» Cardiff : 16/04/2014 21:59:00
» Man City : 16/04/2014 21:56:00

Current Site Poll (view all polls)

MOTM v Norwich City?
Suggested By:  putney
Stockdale 65%
Riether 0%
Hangeland 0%
Heitinga 0%
Amorebieta 5%
Sidwell 0%
Kasami 0%
Diarra 10%
Rodallega 5%
Holtby 15%
Richardson 0%
Parker 0%
Dejagah 0%
Kvist 0%