Fulham - McBride - Fulham to Toronto to Chicago!
UK time is: 04:57:56
Vital Login
Social Login

Choose your club

Other Sites

Network Navigation

Vital Partners

'If It's Football, It's Vital'

McBride - Fulham to Toronto to Chicago!

I`m confused!

I`ve just picked up a paper and read that our former striker Brian McBride will be signing for Toronto FC!

But, that will not be his true destination as he`ll then be sold on immediately to Chicago Fire!

Apparently, it`s something to do with MLS rules!

Can anyone enlighten me what those rules are because it seems a bit strange to me?

Use your social login to comment on front page articles. Login using you Facebook, Twitter, Google or LinkedIn accounts and have your say!

Click here to join in the debate on the club forum.

The Journalist

Writer: Andrew Joyce  Mail feedback, articles or suggestions

Date:Thursday June 19 2008

Time: 5:03PM

Your Comments

Duhh, Me aM? confoozed two
ang on he cant sign 4 chicargo fires as that is 3 clubs in a season
stfc ballboy
Keep in mind MLS is a single entity and the teams are simply franchises. When MLS was established, they set up a bunch of rules to prevent the league from collapsing like the NASL, and this allocation rule is one of them. The fear is that teams in major markets (NY, LA, and Chicago) would provide a much larger attraction for star players (like the New York Cosmos in the NASL) and the other teams would not be able to keep up. This may work in other places in the world with established fan bases, but the fear was that teams in small markets would never be able to establish fan bases if all of the high profile players declined to play for them. So this allocation rule establishes an allocation priority list. A team improves their spot on the list if they are an expansion team, if they missed the playoffs in the previous season, or by selling a player. Now I'm not sure what determines which players this rule applies to, but it seems that only star player signings fall under this rule (a separate MLS discovery claim rule applies to young players). When a player covered by this rule shows interest in signing with MLS, the team at the top of the list gets the first opportunity to sign the player. If the player wants to sign with a different team, the team at the top of the list has three options: 1. They can trade their allocation spot to the team that wants to sign the player. 2. They can pass on the player, in which case they retain their spot at the top of the allocation list. 3. They can refuse to trade their allocation, and the player cannot sign with any other MLS team (I'm not sure when this expires) Right now Toronto sits atop the list, but McBride has made it very public that he is only interested in signing with his hometown team, the Chicago Fire. For Chicago to sign him, they must reach an agreement with Toronto to acquire their allocation slot, and then come to terms with McBride. It is thought that the sticking point at the moment is that Toronto is asking for too much for the allocation spot (the rumors are that they are asking for two of Chicago's best young players). Toronto believes they have leverage because Chicago desperately wants McBride, but Chicago believes they have leverage because McBride will never sign with Toronto.
ohh, I Iz confoozed no more
Also, to complicate things a bit, there are rumors that the US National team has asked McBride to play on the olympic team. If he does that he wouldn't be available until very late in the MLS season, which gives Chicago less incentive to sign him this season. But most people think he will only play on the olympic team if he doesn't sign w/ Chicago.
Now the mls rumors site is reporting that the deal is done.
Thanks for that Samizdat7! Very well explained!
ora as Toronot published in th eforum - Toronto FC hold the #1 allocation spot for returning USMNT players...they have the first shot at signing McBride and then trading him, trading his rights without signing him, or passing all together and keeping their #1 spot. It's just a strange MLS rule that I think was put in place in the Leagues infancy to ensure all teams had and equal chance at signing good players...this rule doesn't really need to be around now since the quality of players coming to MLS has rising dramatically in the past few years...I have a strong feeling that TFC will want something for McBride though, he is still a very good player who they shouldn't pass up on.
Fulham Badger
anyone any the wiser yet?
Fulham Badger
lol - not in the slightest!
Al Billy

Have Your Say

Log in...
with your social network     OR     with your Vital account

Recent Fulham Articles

That Man Bruce Is Mentioned Again! (Sunday October 11 2015)

Fulham Fans Paid £14.08 per game? (Friday October 9 2015)

Shameful Sky Sports, Shameful! (Thursday October 8 2015)

Concern About Dembele`s Fulham Future (Thursday October 8 2015)

Charlton 2 Fulham 2 (Sunday October 4 2015)

Stats: Charlton Athletic v Fulham (Sunday October 4 2015)

Charlton v Fulham - Team-News (Sunday October 4 2015)

Archived Fulham Articles

List All Vital Fulham Articles
Have your say
Click here to suggest an article
Click here to suggest a poll
ScoopDragon Publishing Entire League Network of Sites

League Table (view table)

Team P W D L GD Pts
10. Sheff Wed 10 4 3 3 1 15
11. Q.P.R. 10 4 3 3 -2 15
12. Ipswich 10 4 3 3 -2 15
13. Fulham 10 3 3 4 1 12
14. Forest 10 3 3 4 -1 12
15. Blackburn 10 2 5 3 2 11
16. Leeds Utd 10 2 5 3 -4 11

Fulham Fixtures (view all)

Breaking League News

Ryan Fraser Suffers Serious Knee Injury
Ipswich : 13/10/2015 19:28:00
Is It In Mick We Trust?
Ipswich : 13/10/2015 17:48:00
Duo Head To Rodney Parade
Cardiff : 13/10/2015 16:42:00
Martin Gets First Goal, Ireland Settle For Play-Offs
Derby County : 13/10/2015 15:15:00
Owls Keeping Coach Rhodes on Wildsmith`s England U21 Call Up
Sheff Wed : 13/10/2015 15:09:00

Current Site Poll (view all polls)

MOTM v Charlton (a)?
Suggested By:  putney
Lonergan 4%
Richards 0%
Stearman 5%
Ream 0%
Husband 0%
Christensen 0%
Tunnicliffe 0%
O'Hara 52%
Pringle 5%
McCormack 11%
Dembele 0%
Garbutt 0%
Woodrow 0%
Mattile 23%